TidefolioA LAUNCHPAD FOR YOUR FIRST LIQUIDITY
Give your launch
a course.
Before the first trade, choose the shape of your market.
Compare three liquidity routes. Change the assumptions.Keep a record of why you chose.Plot a scenario ↓
One starting budget. Three different commitments.
Choose a route to inspect its trade-offs.
| Liquidity route | Setup cost | Swap fee | Quote reserve | Capital held back | Stage match |
|---|
THE FIELD NOTES
Not a promise.
A testable premise.
Depth is a choice with a cost. Our local model makes both visible before you commit to a launch.
01 — What is being modeled?
Three illustrative constant-product pools, each starting at 1 USDC per example token. Capital after setup is split between a pool commitment and a held-back balance. Half the pool commitment is the USDC reserve; the other half is token value.
02 — Follow the arithmetic
Commitment = (capital − setup) × route allocation. Reserve = commitment ÷ 2. Net order = order × (1 − swap fee). Tokens received = reserve × net order ÷ (reserve + net order). Price impact = (1 − tokens received ÷ net order) × 100%. Impact excludes the separately shown swap fee.
03 — Where the model ends
Fixed assumptions, no live liquidity. Gas, MEV, price changes, token taxes and third-party platform fees are excluded. The stage match is a planning tag, not an investment recommendation. Contracts, audits and wallet submission are not implemented.
04 — A useful token, by design
Tidefolio Credits are planned for publishing versioned route templates and coordinating parameter reviews. Access, governance and issuance require future contracts. This local scenario tool is available without a token.